Buy new:
$49.99
$3.99 delivery May 20 - 21
Ships from: aberdeentp
Sold by: aberdeentp
$49.99
$3.99 delivery May 20 - 21. Details
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
$$49.99 () Includes selected options. Includes initial monthly payment and selected options. Details
Price
Subtotal
$$49.99
Subtotal
Initial payment breakdown
Shipping cost, delivery date, and order total (including tax) shown at checkout.
Ships from
aberdeentp
Ships from
aberdeentp
Sold by
aberdeentp
Sold by
aberdeentp
Returns
Eligible for Return, Refund or Replacement within 30 days of receipt
Eligible for Return, Refund or Replacement within 30 days of receipt
This item can be returned in its original condition for a full refund or replacement within 30 days of receipt. You may receive a partial or no refund on used, damaged or materially different returns.
Read full return policy
Returns
Eligible for Return, Refund or Replacement within 30 days of receipt
This item can be returned in its original condition for a full refund or replacement within 30 days of receipt. You may receive a partial or no refund on used, damaged or materially different returns.
Read full return policy
Payment
Secure transaction
Your transaction is secure
We work hard to protect your security and privacy. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others. Learn more
Payment
Secure transaction
We work hard to protect your security and privacy. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others. Learn more
$20.29
FREE Returns
Shipped within 24 hours. Clean, undamaged book with no damage to pages and minimal wear to the cover. Spine still tight, in very good condition. Remember if you are not happy, you are covered by our 100% money back guarantee. Shipped within 24 hours. Clean, undamaged book with no damage to pages and minimal wear to the cover. Spine still tight, in very good condition. Remember if you are not happy, you are covered by our 100% money back guarantee. See less
FREE delivery May 23 - June 10. Details
Only 4 left in stock - order soon.
$$49.99 () Includes selected options. Includes initial monthly payment and selected options. Details
Price
Subtotal
$$49.99
Subtotal
Initial payment breakdown
Shipping cost, delivery date, and order total (including tax) shown at checkout.
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
Ships from and sold by Bahamut Media.
Amazon book clubs early access
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club? Learn more
Amazon book clubs early access

Join or create book clubs

Choose books together

Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Explore Amazon Book Clubs
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Follow the author

Stephen English
+ Follow
More books from this author
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

The Army of Alexander the Great Hardcover – January 1, 2009

by Stephen English (Author)
4.0 4.0 out of 5 stars 16 ratings
See all formats and editions
{"desktop_buybox_group_1":[{"displayPrice":"$49.99","priceAmount":49.99,"currencySymbol":"$","integerValue":"49","decimalSeparator":".","fractionalValue":"99","symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"oGU%2BYPm7scy1XJIroQouiscm4pDvnAUDwXxfdQDqxEOIlTyvsAfYNZpB4TpU8m2jXwsKGMGv9LkIqQQE6MniKXcHtajdXVgodp7krOYLZlBV9IL1pYacl9d5Kzjngs4VbPCvDd2jsVqD1Myhw3UiNsHZERXL%2FcqtySXxrsoxlOM%3D","locale":"en-US","buyingOptionType":"NEW","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":0}, {"displayPrice":"$20.29","priceAmount":20.29,"currencySymbol":"$","integerValue":"20","decimalSeparator":".","fractionalValue":"29","symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"oGU%2BYPm7scy1XJIroQouiscm4pDvnAUDXqBJTSNkvz9sEPOtZAmOAW9pOeVUyI%2BxYmlj30vnwABIGA8o5IhGnlWv5iscCXbNllGwYexTSQtZUkvJoBf0X1EsMlAFsSRNkMjKP76RPoMZ0GdNP24Gg%2BNbUZKhw1zqdFGO92RBQcYuklWx9T7fTA%3D%3D","locale":"en-US","buyingOptionType":"USED","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":1}]}

Purchase options and add-ons

The Army of Alexander the Great Alexander the Great is one of the most famous men in history, and many believe he was the greatest military genius of all time (Julius Caesar wept at the feet of his statue in envy of his achievements). Most of his thirteen year reign as king of Macedon was spent in hard campaigning which conquered half the known world, during which he was never defeated in open battle and never besieged a city he... Full description
Read more Read less
Previous page
  1. Print length
    192 pages
  2. Language
    English
  3. Publisher
    Pen & Sword Military
  4. Publication date
    January 1, 2009
  5. Dimensions
    6.46 x 0.87 x 9.53 inches
  6. ISBN-10
    184415839X
  7. ISBN-13
    978-1844158393
  8. See all details
Next page
The Amazon Book Review
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.

Product details

  • Publisher ‏ : ‎ Pen & Sword Military (January 1, 2009)
  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • Hardcover ‏ : ‎ 192 pages
  • ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 184415839X
  • ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-1844158393
  • Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 1.12 pounds
  • Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 6.46 x 0.87 x 9.53 inches
  • Customer Reviews:
    4.0 4.0 out of 5 stars 16 ratings

About the author

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.
Stephen English

Stephen English

Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more

Customer reviews

4 out of 5 stars
4 out of 5
16 global ratings

Top reviews from the United States

Barry C. Jacobsen
2.0 out of 5 stars Started as a Master's Thesis, and (sadly) Reads Like One
Reviewed in the United States on February 11, 2024
Verified Purchase
Sometimes over-technical, obtuse, and overall a difficult read. The information is not for informed students of Macedonian military history, as the information is often pretty basic stuff. And for newbies to the subject it's written in an academic fashion that is too much information presented in a sometimes confusing fashion.
Helpful
 Report
Ted Frederick
4.0 out of 5 stars Good overview of Alexander and his armies
Reviewed in the United States on July 14, 2022
Verified Purchase
Good means to understand why he's referred to as The Great.
Helpful
 Report
T. Carradine
3.0 out of 5 stars I couldn’t finish it.
Reviewed in the United States on January 9, 2021
Verified Purchase
It was rather boring with a detailed description of the army. Nothing much about battles or sieges. This author really puts you to sleep.
3 people found this helpful
Helpful
 Report
JPS
3.0 out of 5 stars A good overall presentation with some controversial points and problems
Reviewed in the United States on March 13, 2012
REview first posted on Amazon.co.uk on 20 January 2012

I bought this book in 2010 and have recently discovered that it has not been reviewed, although it was released a year before. This is the first volume of three, with the other two dealing with Alexander's sieges and siege engines and his field campaigns. However, this volume also has a couple of pieces towards the end on each of these topics, probably because it is meant to be also a standalone book, as opposed to "episode 1".

Stephen English, who used his master's degree thesis as the basis of this book, has done a decent job in presenting the main features of Alexander's army and reviewing most, if not all, of the issues related to it and which historians have been debating for decades. In this respect, his bibliography, which is significantly longer that what you generally find in Pen and Sword's books and includes some of the older works, shows that he has extensively researched his subject. There are, however, quite a few problems associated with this work.

One knd of issue is that he tends to present certain views as firm conclusions where he is, at best, presenting his own take based on shaky evidence or even on what seems to be the most plausible solution or explanation, in his view. This can lead to some controversial statements such as:
- his presentation of the phalangites as "peltats", because they had smaller shields than hoplites and because he assumes that they had little body protection (i.e. no armour). On the latter point, the issue is more complex that he seems to make it out. They do no seem to have worn metal armour but could perfectly well have had leather armour, which was considerably cheaper to make. Anyway, the phalangites' main function was to be close order line infantry, not light infantry. Anyway, this is one of these issues that historians have been debating for ages, something that English does not even mention

- the Thessalian cavalry's ability to fight with the Macedonian horse lance (a shortter version of the infantry pike). We do know that Macedonian Companion cavalry did use such a lance and the Prodromoi scouts used it as well. Whether, and to what extent the Thessalians did under Alexander is probably no more than an educated guess. They were originally equiped with javelins, just like all Greek cavalry at the time. They could, of course, have been re-equiped, but there is little firm evidence backing such a case

- another, rather strange, assertion is that most Greek mercenaries (including those serving the Great King) were mainly peltasts, as opposed to hoplites. Now this is somewhat (very?) unlikely, if only because the Empire had masses of light infantry of its own and what it seems to have needed and wanted was line infantry. The author also bypasses the reason for this apparent confusion: during the last years and after the end of the Great War between Athens and Sparta, hoplite armour tended to get lighter, in an attempt to both enhance mobility and reduce cost (bronze corslets were frightfully expensive and took a long time to make) without unduly reducing protection. However, cost would clearly NOT have been an issue for the Great King...

There are also a number of other issues that come up throughout the book
- one is a tendancy for anachronisms or somewhat inadequate comparisons, largely because the book is targeted to the general reader. So, for instance, war elephants get compared to German panzers...
- another is a tendancy to make educated guesses and present them as facts or firm conclusions, without acknowledging that they are, at best, assumptions
- a third is to discuss points and present conclusions that the discussion does not really support. The best example of this is the somewhat superficial discussion of Alexander's decision to disband his fleet. Another is the assumption he makes that the ships and crews that Alexander had been provided with were low-quality, in fact the worst that his Allies could come up with. This is possible, of course, but there is no firm evidence backing this kind of statement. It's just another "conclusion" drawn from thin air
- curiously, while the book contains numerous areas where the author is making educated guesses (although he generally does not acknowledge them as such), there is no attempt whatsoever to quantify the army's size during Alexander's reign. The discussion on initial numbers is good. The description and explanations of the various reorganizations are also good, but no sense of magnitude regarding the army's size in, say, Central Asia (after 330), India or during the last year of his reign is even attempted.

So. A good read. A good overall presentation and summary of Alexander's military forces, but only up to a point...
21 people found this helpful
Helpful
 Report
JLMA
2.0 out of 5 stars Much too technical
Reviewed in the United States on May 25, 2013
Verified Purchase
I expected information about their feats, not about their shoes. It is a work for scholars who understand the subject. For the layman it is too dense.
5 people found this helpful
Helpful
 Report

Top reviews from other countries

Joe S
5.0 out of 5 stars Brief, Readable - Contains the Essentials
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on April 25, 2021
Verified Purchase
I'm not a fan of pure military history but I do find Alexander fascinating so thought I'd give this a go. For me it was readable, often books about the make up and organisation of armies are very dull, full of lists and numbers and repetitive information. This was only 150 pages and really was a very basic overview which I personally preferred.
Report
Shawn D. Osborne
5.0 out of 5 stars A Very Thorough Examination
Reviewed in Canada on October 18, 2013
Verified Purchase
This book provides an in-depth look at every aspect of Alexander The Great's army. Logistics, weaponry, the chain of command, mercenary troops..its all here. There is also a section on the little-discussed topic of the Macedonian King's navy; although officially decommissioned by Alexander shortly after gaining a foothold in Asia, the young conqueror's fleet played a role that English rightfully deems worth mentioning.
The author has done a good job of bringing some original perspective to an aspect of Alexander studies that has never, in my opinion, been dealt with in such fine detail drawing upon evidence provided through the four main Ancient sources (Arrian, Curtius, Diodorus, Plutarch) we have at our disposal.
Highly recommended.
Report
JPS
3.0 out of 5 stars A good overall presentation with some controversial points and problems
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on January 20, 2012
Verified Purchase
I bought this book in 2010 and have recently discovered that it has not been reviewed, although it was released a year before. This is the first volume of three, with the other two dealing with Alexander's sieges and siege engines and his field campaigns. However, this volume also has a couple of pieces towards the end on each of these topics, probably because it is meant to be also a standalone book, as opposed to "episode 1".

Stephen English, who used his master's degree thesis as the basis of this book, has done a decent job in presenting the main features of Alexander's army and reviewing most, if not all, of the issues related to it and which historians have been debating for decades. In this respect, his bibliography, which is significantly longer that what you generally find in Pen and Sword's books and includes some of the older works, shows that he has extensively researched his subject. There are, however, quite a few problems associated with this work.

One knd of issue is that he tends to present certain views as firm conclusions where he is, at best, presenting his own take based on shaky evidence or even on what seems to be the most plausible solution or explanation, in his view. This can lead to some controversial statements such as:
- his presentation of the phalangites as "peltats", because they had smaller shields than hoplites and because he assumes that they had little body protection (i.e. no armour). On the latter point, the issue is more complex that he seems to make it out. They do no seem to have worn metal armour but could perfectly well have had leather armour, which was considerably cheaper to make. Anyway, the phalangites' main function was to be close order line infantry, not light infantry. Anyway, this is one of these issues that historians have been debating for ages, something that English does not even mention

- the Thessalian cavalry's ability to fight with the Macedonian horse lance (a shortter version of the infantry pike). We do know that Macedonian Companion cavalry did use such a lance and the Prodromoi scouts used it as well. Whether, and to what extent the Thessalians did under Alexander is probably no more than an educated guess. They were originally equiped with javelins, just like all Greek cavalry at the time. They could, of course, have been re-equiped, but there is little firm evidence backing such a case

- another, rather strange, assertion is that most Greek mercenaries (including those serving the Great King) were mainly peltasts, as opposed to hoplites. Now this is somewhat (very?) unlikely, if only because the Empire had masses of light infantry of its own and what it seems to have needed and wanted was line infantry. The author also bypasses the reason for this apparent confusion: during the last years and after the end of the Great War between Athens and Sparta, hoplite armour tended to get lighter, in an attempt to both enhance mobility and reduce cost (bronze corslets were frightfully expensive and took a long time to make) without unduly reducing protection. However, cost would clearly NOT have been an issue for the Great King...

There are also a number of other issues that come up throughout the book
- one is a tendancy for anachronisms or somewhat inadequate comparisons, largely because the book is targeted to the general reader. So, for instance, war elephants get compared to German panzers...
- another is a tendancy to make educated guesses and present them as facts or firm conclusions, without acknowledging that they are, at best, assumptions
- a third is to discuss points and present conclusions that the discussion does not really support. The best example of this is the somewhat superficial discussion of Alexander's decision to disband his fleet. Another is the assumption he makes that the ships and crews that Alexander had been provided with were low-quality, in fact the worst that his Allies could come up with. This is possible, of course, but there is no firm evidence backing this kind of statement. It's just another "conclusion" drawn from thin air
- curiously, while the book contains numerous areas where the author is making educated guesses (although he generally does not acknowledge them as such), there is no attempt whatsoever to quantify the army's size during Alexander's reign. The discussion on initial numbers is good. The description and explanations of the various reorganizations are also good, but no sense of magnitude regarding the army's size in, say, Central Asia (after 330), India or during the last year of his reign is even attempted.

So. A good read. A good overall presentation and summary of Alexander's military forces, but only up to a point...
17 people found this helpful
 Report