Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
$51.99$51.99
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
$42.77$42.77
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: MainBookGuys
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
OK
Nerva and the Roman Succession Crisis of AD 96-99 (Roman Imperial Biographies)
Purchase options and add-ons
The imperial succession at Rome was notoriously uncertain, and where possible hereditary succession was preferred.
John Grainger's detailed study looks at aperiod of intrigue and conspiracy. He explores how, why and by whom Domitian was killed, the rule of Nerva, chosen to succeed him, and finally Nerva's own choice of successor, Trajan, who became a strong and respected emperor against the odds.
Perhaps most significantly Grainger investigates the effects of this dynastic uncertainty both inside and outside the ruling group in Rome, asking why civil war did not occur in this time of political upheaval.
The last time a dynasty had failed, in AD 68, a damaging military conflict had resulted; at the next failure in AD 192, another war broke out; by the third century civil war was institutionalized, and was one of the main reasons for the eventual downfall of the entire imperial structure. Grainger argues that though AD 96-98 stands out as the civil war that did not happen, it was a perilously close-run thing.
- ISBN-100415349583
- ISBN-13978-0415349581
- Publication dateAugust 19, 2004
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions6.14 x 0.44 x 9.21 inches
- Print length192 pages
Customers who bought this item also bought
Editorial Reviews
Review
'Grainger's accunt of Nerva will no doubt become the standard work in English for a while to come. Its thoroughness and the sobriety of its analyses make it a realiable guide and worthy addition to the ... bookshelf.' - Scholia Reviews, 12, 2003, 25
'The book is as beautifully presented as it is lucdily written ... The author is to be commended for a worthwhile addition to Routledge's series of Imperial biographies.' - Bryn Mawr Classical Review
About the Author
John D. Grainger is a freelance historian and former teacher. He is the author of several books on ancient history including Seleukos Nikator, The League of Aitolians and The Roman War of Antiochus the Great.
Product details
- Publisher : Routledge (August 19, 2004)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 192 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0415349583
- ISBN-13 : 978-0415349581
- Item Weight : 1.76 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.14 x 0.44 x 9.21 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #2,933,815 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #921 in Ancient Rome Biographies
- #1,368 in Historical Germany Biographies
- #4,495 in Ancient Roman History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author
Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Nerva proved to be a wise choice. An affable, diplomatic veteran of court life who had secured high favor in the reigns of Nero, Vespasian and Domitian (three very different emperors), Nerva was also experienced in the art of political timing and maneuver. He also was wise enough to secure advice from Senatorial elite in making a choice of eventual successor to the imperial power. In the face of assassination threats and uprisings among the Guards, Nerva used the occasion of a Roman victory against the German tribes announced in October 97 to defuse the danger by naming as his successor, Trajan, the respected commander of the largest and closest body of legions (frontier of Upper Germany). Bereft of any military reputation himself, Nerva now had the immense military prestige of Trajan at his back and was able to continue his reign peacefully until his death at the end of January 98.
Grainger uses sources from the time, including coins, inscriptions from monuments and public works to assess the particular contributions of Nerva to the events and critical decisions taking place. Although only 16 months in length, the reign of Nerva proved to be very active in terms of useful legislation and also the furtherance of the elements of good government begun by Domitian. The avoidance of civil war was probably the single biggest advantage derived from Nerva’s reign. Peace and prosperity continued under Trajan, Hadrian, Antoninus Pius and Marcus Aurelius for more than 80 years after Nerva’s death. Since those alive at the time remembered the bloodshed and destruction of the civil wars of 68-69, it is obvious that this preservation of order was appreciated by the ruling elite. Nerva was deified and honored after his death. We ourselves can assess the tragedy of the civil wars of the 190s (following the assassination of Commodus) and throughout the 3rd Century that eventually led to the fall of the Roman Empire.
Unlike many of the ancient historians, Grainger gives due credit to Domitian for his military and administrative acumen. Nerva, despite his brief reign, left behind a significant legacy of useful legislation and continuity of the best aspects of the Flavian era into the widely heralded golden age of Trajan. The book is well-written and interesting, but a scholarly and challenging rather than suitable for casual reading.
The first two chapters (assassination and conspiration) certainly read as a detective story as John Grainger points to the most likely suspects behind the murder. At times, this is mostly speculative, but it is well argumented and the case is well made. Another strong point is that it plunges you into the rather unhealthy atmospheres of the Imperial Palace and the Senate.
The second part is an assessment of Nerva, the reactions to the assassination, and Nerva's actions as an emperor. Nerva was old, in poor health and childless. He was a survivor from Nero's regime. He had no support in the army and could not expect to live for long: he was essentially a caretake or a stop-gap. Grainger argues this is largely why he was not opposed by the army which he sees as the real power.
The next part explains why Trajan was chosen in what Grainger presents as a bloodless coup. He wasn't the only possible candidate but he had all of the necessary requirements, including the links with the other generals - all of which were senators, some military experience, being part of the aristocracy and, most of all, impressive networks with the up and coming aristocracies of the provinces. He was also of the right age group - in his fourties - unlike some of the more distinguished generals which were at least a decade older.
This book is great reading, if at times a bit heavy going when Grainger details all of the marriage connections between the various powerful families. This is of course crucial since it shows to what extent Trajan benefited from these connections which other potential candidates did not have to the same extent. However, it is also get sometimes confusing, despite all of the genealogical trees of the powerful families to show their interconnexions.
One of Grainger's final assessments is a comparison between Domitian's and Trajan's strategic visions. He goes a long way towards rehabilitating Domitian which was blackened by the Senate, his successors (Nerva and Trajan) and, above all, by Tacitus and Pliny. Both of them were stauch supporters and admirers of Trajan, and are those who have done the most to ensure his posterity as one of the "great" Emperor-soldiers, while denigrating Domitian. Domitian is traditionnally portrayed as having failed in his Danubian wars, unlike Trajan, who succeeded. Grainger shows that neither statement were true. Domitian had some significant successes on the Rhine frontier to the extent that this frontier was quiet for about 100 years after his reign. IT is also under Domitian that the frontier was extended beyond the Rhine to the Taunus hills, including all the region that is now called the Black Forest adn was called the DEcumate Fields under the Romans. Grainger also attributes to Domitian a strategic project of conquest which, if it had been pursued and successful, could have pushed the Roman frontiers some 300 km to the north of the Danube.
Grainger does a very good job in showing that Domitian was a much better emperor (even if ruthless toward the Senate - hence the bad press) that what he has been portrayed to be, to the extent that, at times, you get the impression this book is about him rather than about Nerva and the succession. I was, however, less convinced by Grainger's presentation of Trajan whom he obviously seems to dislike and whom he believes to have been both less intelligent, less good as a strategist and less capable than Domitian.
So, well worth four stars, but not quite five.
Top reviews from other countries
Nerva clearly had an uncanny knack for survival; his connections with Tiberius, Nero and Otho did not condemn him under Vitellius, and he then emerged in safety under Vespasian. To have safely managed to survive under Domitian and to then succeed him aged in his sixties took a man who clearly had the gods on his side. Given Nerva's short reign, the author has quite rightly looked in some detail at how Nerva succeeded Domitian, and then passed on the succession to Trajan, and how both these were achieved without the type of civil war that erupted in AD 68-69. This is the importance to the Roman Empire of Nerva's rule, and this is what we know most about now. Domitian's legacy (political, military, cultural) and the transition to Trajan are important factors throughout Nerva's short rule.
While this book comes in at under 170 pages, it does have very small print, so there's quite a bit of reading in it, and that's a good thing. These Routledge editions on ancient history are very worthwhile. I have read a number of the volumes on other Roman emperors, and still have some more in my pile to be read. The editions are always written by specialist and authoritative authors on the subject, and are very nicely presented.
The story is intriguing and interesting, and vitally important to an understanding of the Roman Empire. The years AD 96-98 were pivotal in the history of the Empire's succession strategy and ongoing settling of political and cultural methodologies, and Nerva's reign, short though it was, remains a key element of the Empire for its ability to stabilise the aftermath of Domitian's reign and pave the way for the rule of Trajan.
I'm not sure if these books are a series as such but it is similarly laid out to the other Roman Emperor biographies from this publisher with a similar cover (Barbara Levick's "Claudius" and "Vespasian" for example).
I.e. not a straight, chronological biography but each chapter being a topic.
I suppose therefore these are more study books for the academic, as opposed to accessible biographies, but I am not an academic and enjoyed this well enough.
Also, with it being the only book I could find on Nerva, I can only recommend it!
The first two chapters (assassination and conspiration) certainly read as a detective story as John Grainger points to the most likely suspects behind the murder. At times, this is mostly speculative, but it is well argumented and the case is well made. Another strong point is that it plunges you into the rather unhealthy atmospheres of the Imperial Palace and the Senate.
The second part is an assessment of Nerva, the reactions to the assassination, and Nerva's actions as an emperor. Nerva was old, in poor health and childless. He was a survivor from Nero's regime. He had no support in the army and could not expect to live for long: he was essentially a caretake or a stop-gap. Grainger argues this is largely why he was not opposed by the army which he sees as the real power.
The next part explains why Trajan was chosen in what Grainger presents as a bloodless coup. He wasn't the only possible candidate but he had all of the necessary requirements, including the links with the other generals - all of which were senators, some military experience, being part of the aristocracy and, most of all, impressive networks with the up and coming aristocracies of the provinces. He was also of the right age group - in his fourties - unlike some of the more distinguished generals which were at least a decade older.
This book is great reading, if at times a bit heavy going when Grainger details all of the marriage connections between the various powerful families. This is of course crucial since it shows to what extent Trajan benefited from these connections which other potential candidates did not have to the same extent. However, it is also get sometimes confusing, despite all of the genealogical trees of the powerful families to show their interconnexions.
One of Grainger's final assessments is a comparison between Domitian's and Trajan's strategic visions. He goes a long way towards rehabilitating Domitian which was blackened by the Senate, his successors (Nerva and Trajan) and, above all, by Tacitus and Pliny. Both of them were stauch supporters and admirers of Trajan, and are those who have done the most to ensure his posterity as one of the "great" Emperor-soldiers, while denigrating Domitian. Domitian is traditionnally portrayed as having failed in his Danubian wars, unlike Trajan, who succeeded. Grainger shows that neither statement were true. Domitian had some significant successes on the Rhine frontier to the extent that this frontier was quiet for about 100 years after his reign. IT is also under Domitian that the frontier was extended beyond the Rhine to the Taunus hills, including all the region that is now called the Black Forest adn was called the DEcumate Fields under the Romans. Grainger also attributes to Domitian a strategic project of conquest which, if it had been pursued and successful, could have pushed the Roman frontiers some 300 km to the north of the Danube.
Grainger does a very good job in showing that Domitian was a much better emperor (even if ruthless toward the Senate - hence the bad press) that what he has portrayed to be, to the extent that, at times, you get the impression this book is about him rather than about Nerva and the succession. I was, however, less convinced by Grainger's presentation of Trajan whom he obviously seems to dislike and whom he believes to have been both less intelligent and less capable than Domitian.
So, well worth four stars, but not quite five.